Compare journals
Get an email when this journal's indexing changes
Added to or removed from Scopus, Web of Science, ABDC, DOAJ, FT50, UT Dallas or ONOS. One confirmation click; unsubscribe anytime.
Reviews in Clinical Gerontology
Reviews in Clinical Gerontology is not currently indexed in Scopus. Published by Cambridge University Press.
Checked against the index lists dated .
ISSN 0959-2598Verify ISSN ↗1469-9036Verify ISSN ↗
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Cost to publish: No APC data — check the publisher
Not listed in: Web of Science, DOAJ, ABDC, ABS / AJG, FT50, UT Dallas, ONOS (subscription), ONOS (APC covered)
Quick answers
Is Reviews in Clinical Gerontology indexed in Scopus?
No — it was previously covered by Scopus but its coverage is now inactive/discontinued (1991–2015).
What is the impact factor of Reviews in Clinical Gerontology?
Reviews in Clinical Gerontology has no Journal Impact Factor — JIF is published only for journals in the Web of Science Core Collection (SCIE, SSCI, AHCI and ESCI) — and Scopus has not published a current CiteScore for it either. Treat any "impact factor" quoted for this journal elsewhere as unofficial.
Who publishes Reviews in Clinical Gerontology and what is its ISSN?
Reviews in Clinical Gerontology is published by Cambridge University Press. Its print ISSN is 0959-2598 and its online ISSN is 1469-9036.
Is Reviews in Clinical Gerontology in Web of Science?
No — it is not currently in the Web of Science core collections (SCIE, SSCI, AHCI or ESCI).
Is Reviews in Clinical Gerontology open access?
No — it is not registered as an open-access journal in DOAJ or Scopus.
Scopus coverage history
Scopus indexed Reviews in Clinical Gerontology for 25 years, between 1991 and 2015. Coverage ended in 2015, 11 years ago, and Scopus now lists the title as inactive.
Is it still publishing? OpenAlex lists 858 works and 12,608 citations for the title. Its most recent paper is from 2015, in line with the end of Scopus coverage in 2015, which suggests the journal stopped publishing around then.
How well cited is Reviews in Clinical Gerontology? — open metrics via OpenAlex
Reviews in Clinical Gerontology has an h-index of 47 and a 2-year mean of 0 citations per paper (OpenAlex).
Reviews in Clinical Gerontology published 17 papers in 2015; its busiest recent year was 2010 with 43. 2026* is the year so far.
h-index, i10-index and 2-year mean citedness are open, licence-clear metrics from OpenAlex — not a proprietary impact factor. Updated 2026-10-14.
Are there integrity warnings for Reviews in Clinical Gerontology? — indicators, not proof of misconduct
Scopus status: Inactive — coverage ended 2015. No retracted papers are recorded. The Problematic Paper Screener flags none of its papers. These are indicators to check, not findings against the journal.
- Scopus statusInactive — coverage ended 2015
- Retracted papers None recorded
- Problematic Paper Screener flags None flagged
Retractions from OpenAlex; flags from the Problematic Paper Screener (Cabanac, Labbé & Magazinov, CC BY), 2026-09-21 export. A flag marks a paper for a closer look; it is not a finding against the journal.
Official sources & links
Community experience: reader comments on this journal
More from Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press has 414 other titles in our data; 373 are currently indexed in Scopus.
Related journals
8 journalsIndex data is curated from public sources (Scopus, Web of Science, ABDC, FT50, UT Dallas, DOAJ). CiteScore and quartiles reflect the latest available Scopus release. Always verify a journal's current status on its official source before submitting.
Comments load as you scroll here.