| Subject area | Rank | Pctile | Q |
|---|---|---|---|
| Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering | 3 / 425 | 99th | Q1 |
| Food Science | 3 / 420 | 99th | Q1 |
Compare journals
Get an email when this journal's indexing changes
Added to or removed from Scopus, Web of Science, ABDC, DOAJ, FT50, UT Dallas or ONOS. One confirmation click; unsubscribe anytime.
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition is Scopus-indexed (Q1, CiteScore 29.4), WoS SCIE. It is covered by India's One Nation One Subscription scheme for reading access. Published by Taylor and Francis Ltd..
Checked against the index lists dated .
ISSN 1040-8398Verify ISSN ↗1549-7852Verify ISSN ↗
Publisher: Taylor and Francis Ltd.
Cost to publish: No APC data — check the publisher
Not listed in: DOAJ, ABDC, ABS / AJG, FT50, UT Dallas, ONOS (APC covered)
Quick answers
Is Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition indexed in Scopus?
Yes — actively indexed in Scopus, coverage 1988–present (also 1983–1984, 1981), best quartile Q1, CiteScore 29.4.
What quartile is Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition in Scopus?
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition is Q1 in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (rank 3 of 425) and Q1 in Food Science (rank 3 of 420), by CiteScore 2025.
What is the impact factor of Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition?
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition is indexed in the Science Citation Index Expanded, so it may have a Journal Impact Factor in Clarivate's Journal Citation Reports. JCR is paid, so check it for the current value. The closest free measure is its Scopus CiteScore 29.4, which places it in quartile Q1 at the 99th percentile of its subject. Its SCImago Journal Rank (SJR, a free Scopus-based metric) is 2.243, quartile Q1, with an H-index of 262.
Who publishes Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition and what is its ISSN?
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition is published by Taylor and Francis Ltd. Its print ISSN is 1040-8398 and its online ISSN is 1549-7852.
Is Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition covered under ONOS in India?
Yes. It is part of the One Nation One Subscription (ONOS) national subscription, so readers at participating Indian institutions get its full text. ONOS does not cover its article processing charge.
Is Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition in Web of Science?
Yes — indexed in the Science Citation Index Expanded.
Is Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition open access?
No — it is not registered as an open-access journal in DOAJ or Scopus.
How well cited is Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition? — open metrics via OpenAlex
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition has an h-index of 305 and a 2-year mean of 9.53 citations per paper (OpenAlex). Its Scopus CiteScore is 29.4, quartile Q1. On 2-year citations it ranks #18 of 359 Scopus journals in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering.
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition published 305 papers in 2025; its busiest recent year was 2022 with 664. 2026* is the year so far.
h-index, i10-index and 2-year mean citedness are open, licence-clear metrics from OpenAlex — not a proprietary impact factor. The subject rank counts only journals that OpenAlex has a figure for; it is not a Scopus or Clarivate ranking. Updated 2026-10-14.
Who publishes in Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition? — latest 100 articles, 2026
In its latest 100 research articles (2026), authors are most often from China (36.1%), United States (14.3%) and India (5.3%).
Countries are counted fractionally, so a paper by authors from two countries counts half to each.
Are there integrity warnings for Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition? — indicators, not proof of misconduct
Scopus status: Active. 13 retracted papers are recorded (2.4 per 1,000 papers). The Problematic Paper Screener flags 3 of its papers. These are indicators to check, not findings against the journal.
- Scopus statusActive
- Retracted papers 13 · 2.4 per 1,000 papers
- Problematic Paper Screener flags 3 · 0.6 per 1,000 papers — mostly suspect text and tortured phrases
Retractions from OpenAlex; flags from the Problematic Paper Screener (Cabanac, Labbé & Magazinov, CC BY), 2026-09-21 export. A flag marks a paper for a closer look; it is not a finding against the journal.
Official sources & links
Community experience: reader comments on this journal
Related journals
8 journalsIndex data is curated from public sources (Scopus, Web of Science, ABDC, FT50, UT Dallas, DOAJ). CiteScore and quartiles reflect the latest available Scopus release. Always verify a journal's current status on its official source before submitting.
Comments load as you scroll here.